Bahrain - Human Rights Scorecard [1] |
|
Bahrain, officially the Kingdom of Bahrain, is a small island country situated near the western shores of the Persian Gulf. It is an archipelago with Bahrain Island, the largest land mass, at 55 km long by 18 km wide.[2] Official language: Arabic Ethnic groups: 46% Bahraini; 45.5% Asian; 4.7% other Arabs; 1.6% African; 1% European; 1.2% Other Government: Unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy - King: Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa - Crown Prince: Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa - Prime Minister: Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Death penalty: Retentionist Population: 1.3 million Life expectancy: 75.1 years Under-5 mortality: 12.1 per 1000 Adult literacy: 91.4 percent |
|
Section 1: Respect for the Integrity of the Person Respect for the integrity of the individual is the most fundamental of human rights groupings. It guarantees protection of the person to ensure the right to life, and freedom from torture. It also prevents arbitrary detention, and disappearances, and ensures the right to a free and fair trial when accused.
|
Section 2: Respect for Civil Liberties Civil liberties are a basic category of internationally recognized human rights. They include the freedoms of expression, assembly, association, education, and religion. These are inalienable rights which should not be breeched by government, and should ensure the rights of all, including women and minority groups.
|
Section 3: Respect for Political Rights Political rights ensure all members of society are able to influence the political process. The assessment of political rights includes an examination of the electoral process and the selection of representatives, the political empowerment of the general public, the tolerance of dissent, the accountability of government, etc..
|
Section 4: Corruption and Lack of Transparency in Government The civil, political, economic and social rights exercised within a country are often modulated by the degree of transparency and freedom from corruption. Various international metrics assess transparency and corruption, including the OECD anti-bribery convention, the Bribe Payers Index, and the Open Budget Index.
|
Section 5: Governmental Response to Criticism This section deals specifically with the response heads of state have to civil society or international human rights reports.
|
Section 6: Discrimination and Societal Abuses Legal and social discriminatory practices related to sex, race, creed or sexual orientation, are violations of human rights. Countries with strong civil liberty traditions should have a fair legal system that ensures the rule of law, allows free economic activity, and ensures equality of opportunity for all.
|
Section 7: Workers’ Rights Workers’ rights are a group of legal rights relating to labour relations between workers and their employers. At their core are things like the ability to negotiate pay, benefits, terms of employment, and safe working conditions. These rights often devolve from the right to unionize and access to collective bargaining.
|
[1] A hybrid human rights and freedoms model, leveraging both legal principles and intuitive classifications, has been used for this human rights assessment. The CJPME Foundation has sought to integrate as many independent sources and metrics into its summary analysis as possible. In many cases, for qualitative material pertaining to the respect for a particular right in a country, the CJPME Foundation has drawn on material from Human Rights Watch and the US State Department country reports. Human Rights Watch (HRW) publishes a World Report which assesses the respect for human rights in each country. HRW uses a methodology of local reporting and interviewing, combined with research and analysis to assess the level of respect of human rights. The U.S State Department keeps an updated publication on the state of human rights internationally. Their system of research and accountability draws from the research of official US State Department officials, as well as local civil-society and international human rights organizations.
[2] Commonly-known information on the country is drawn from various Internet sources, including Google country pages, and Amnesty International. For death penalty see: “Death sentences and executions in 2013.” Amnesty International. March 24, 2014. Accessed May 15. 2015. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/act50/001/2014/en/.
[3] "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013 Bahrain." U.S Department of State. January 1, 2013. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/#wrapper.
[4] Ibid. U.S Department of State. For purposes of the present analysis, a “disappearance” is different than simple arbitrary detention because a “disappearance” is considered permanent.
[5] Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[6] Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[7] Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[8] Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[9] The Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders ranks the level of freedom of information in 179 countries. This is determined through the polling of local NGOs and freedom of expression civil society organizations across the globe. This index is also determined by local correspondents and follow-up work done on reports of infringement to press freedom where ever it takes place. Their methodology looks at six different indicators: 1) Media pluralism, 2) Media independence, 3) Media atmosphere and self-censorship, 4) the Law around media, 5) Media transparency, and 6) Media infrastructure. The score from these six indicators is combined with a rating for the violence against journalists in the country to create an overall score. The CJPME Foundation classifies the Press Freedom Index as follows: 0 – 14.99 (25 countries), Largely free, diverse and independent; 15 – 24.99 (29 countries), Mostly free, diverse and independent; 25 – 29.99 (32 countries), Partially free, diverse and independent; 30 – 39.99 (49 countries), Partially controlled, limited or intimidated; 40 & higher (42 countries), Highly controlled, limited or intimidated.
[10] "World Press Freedom Index." Reporters Without Borders: For Freedom of Information. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php.
[11] "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013 Bahrain." U.S Department of State. January 1, 2013. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/#wrapper.
[12] "Bahrain." World Report 2014: Bahrain. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/bahrain.
[13] "Bahrain." International Religious Freedom Report for 2013. January 1, 2013. Accessed May 13, 2015. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm#wrapper.
[14] "Bahrain." World Report 2014: Bahrain. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/bahrain.
[15] Freedom House is an internationally recognized NGO based in the U.S which documents and rates the quality of democratic practice in a given country. Freedom House splits its grading system between the two areas of civil and political rights in a country. On each scale, the Freedom House rating is 1-2.5 (free), 3-5.5 (partly free) and 6-7 (not free).
[16] Freedom House’s Civil Liberties index measures things such as a) freedom of expression and belief, b) associational and organizational rights, c) the rule of law, and d) personal autonomy and individual rights. Freedom House rates countries as 1-2.5 (free), 3-5.5 (partly free) and 6-7 (not free). Accessed Dec. 9, 2014 https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2014/methodology#.VIdwWzHF98F
[17] "Bahrain." Freedom in the World 2014: Bahrain. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2014/bahrain-0#.VIIHLzGG9e8.
[18] See footnote about the Freedom House organization above. The Freedom House Political Rights assessment looks at a) the electoral process, b) political pluralism and participation, and c) the functioning of government. Accessed Dec. 9, 2014 https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2014/methodology#.VIdwWzHF98F
[19] "Bahrain." Freedom in the World 2014: Bahrain. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2014/bahrain-0#.VIIHLzGG9e8.
[20] Transparency International (TI) publishes a “Corruption Perceptions Index” annually, which is based on independent research and polling. The main categories of corruption are broken down within the index to provide particulars on issues including things such as perceptions of corruption, control of corruption, and financial secrecy. A country receives a score on 100; the higher the score, the less corrupt the society. The CJPME foundation has classified them into categories as follows: 80-100 (11 countries): Very limited corruption; 60-79 (27 countries): Limited corruption; 40-59 (41 countries): Some corruption; 20-39 (80 countries): Highly corrupt; 0-19 (15 countries): Extremely corrupt
[21] "Bahrain." Corruption by Country. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. http://www.transparency.org/country#BHR.
[22] "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013 Bahrain." U.S Department of State. January 1, 2013. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/#wrapper.
[23] This metric is based on the World Economic Forum’s Gender Gap Index. 0.00 denotes inequality between the sexes, and 1.00 denotes fully equality between the sexes. This index looks at four subdomains: economic participation and opportunity; educational attainment; health and survival; and political empowerment. Each country is given a percentage score; the higher the percentage, the better the protections. The CJPME Foundation classed the percentages as follows: 80-100% (5 countries): Almost equal rights; 70-79% (60 countries): Somewhat unequal rights; 0-69% (77 countries): Very unequal rights
[24] "Bahrain." World Economic Forum. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2014/economies/#economy=BHR.
[25] This metric is based on the KidsRights Index Overall Score. This index has five subdomains: life expectancy and maternal mortality; health; education; protection; and child rights environment. Each country is given a percentage score; the higher the percentage, the better the protections. KidsRights classes the countries according to these percentages, and the CJPME Foundation has given each class a term as follows: 70-100% (77 countries): Protected; 60-70% (29 countries): Somewhat protected; 45-50% (33 countries): Slightly vulnerable; 30-45% (12 countries): Highly vulnerable; Lower than 30% (11 countries): Extremely vulnerable
[26] "The KidsRights Index: Overall Score." The KidsRights Index. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. http://www.kidsrightsindex.org/Index/Overallscore.aspx
[27] "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013 Bahrain." U.S Department of State. January 1, 2013. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/#wrapper.
[28] Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[29] "ILGA World Map." International Lesbian Gay and Intersex Association. January 1, 2014. Accessed November 25, 2014. http://ilga.org/. See also Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[30] ILGA, the International, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, was founded in 1978 on the principle of highlighting state sponsored homophobia where it exists around the world. ILGA annually publishes a map with an accompanying report on sexual and gender based harassment, which focuses on both the legal and non-legal acts of state sponsored discrimination.
[31] "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013 Bahrain." U.S Department of State. January 1, 2013. Accessed November 23, 2014. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/#wrapper.
[32] Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[33] Ibid. U.S Department of State.
[34] Ibid. U.S Department of State. See also a well-done Wikipedia comparison of wage, income and work week metrics across countries at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_minimum_wages_by_country
[35] "Global Employment Trends." International Labour Organization. January 1, 2013. Accessed December 7, 2014. http://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/global-employment-trends/2014/WCMS_233936/lang--en/index.htm.
Be the first to comment
Sign in with
Facebook